Judicial judgment — Madaba Court of First Instance sitting as an appellate court / Enforcement

Attachment of a Vehicle Used to Sell Goods

Decision reference: Decision No. 624 of 2026, Madaba Court of First Instance sitting as an appellate court, referring to Article 29(c) of the Enforcement Law.

Under the stated principle, a vehicle subject to attachment does not fall within the “machines and tools necessary for the profession” in Article 29(c) of the Enforcement Law. The exemption concerns craft tools essential to operation and production, not the vehicle in the circumstances described.

TOPIC SIGNAL

Courts and procedure

Judicial judgment — Madaba Court of First Instance sitting as an appellate court / Enforcement

Updated: 22 September 2026

Prepared and reviewed by: Ashraf Al-Khawaja

Smart reading summary

Understand and share the study quickly

Instant summary

Key points

Question
Extracted principle
Decision reference

Useful for: Useful for initial reading and identifying questions that may need legal review.

This automatic summary is based on the published text. It is not legal advice and does not replace checking official sources and reviewing the facts with a qualified lawyer.

AI generation is optional and subject to Gemini usage limits. Do not send client data or attachments from this card.

Question

May a bus used by a debtor to sell goods be exempt from attachment as a necessary professional tool?

Extracted principle

Notice: this article is general educational information and does not constitute legal advice or a final assessment of any matter.

Study collection

Courts, judicial principles, and enforcement

Browse the other studies in this subject through its dedicated topical section.

Open study collection

A related service path

Commercial and civil litigation

If this study is close to your matter, review the service scope and contact the firm to discuss the facts and documents.

Review the related service