Judicial principles and studies

Exclusion of Import Stamp Duties from the Concept of Court Fees

Import stamp duties under Articles 10 and 13 are treated as general public financial dues payable on document formalization, not as court fees; therefore their deferment is not governed by Courts' Fees Regulation No. 43/2005.

Updated: 10 September 2026

Prepared and reviewed by: Ashraf Al-Khawaja

01

Subject

This note examines whether duties charged under Articles 10 and 13 of the Import Stamp Duties Law qualify as court fees or as general public financial dues payable when a document is formalized.

02

Summary

Import stamp duties are treated as public financial entitlements tied to the state's public interest rather than as court fees. The deferment provision in the Courts' Fees Regulation No. 43/2005 applies only to court fees set out in that regulation and does not extend to import stamp duties. Article 10 of the Import Stamp Duties Law does not permit requesting deferment of these duties, as it requires payment upon document formalization and renders otherwise unacceptable.

03

Practical significance

Litigants cannot use the deferment mechanism in the Courts' Fees Regulation to postpone payment of import stamp duties. Such duties must be paid on document execution, including on employment contracts despite labor claims being exempt from court fees. This is an educational summary only and does not constitute judicial text or legal advice.

Notice: this article is general educational information and does not constitute legal advice or a final assessment of any matter.

Sources and references

Verify the official text and latest amendments before relying on this material professionally.

Read also