Judicial principles and studies

Reconsideration: Judge's Disqualification to Hear a Case

The study summarizes the Court of Cassation's criteria for a judge's disqualification, and explains the effect of a judge's participation in multiple appellate decisions issued at the same stage.

Updated: 10 September 2026

Prepared and reviewed by: Ashraf Al-Khawaja

01

Subject

The points summarize the Court of Cassation's rule that a judge is disqualified to hear a case only if the judge previously adjudicated the same case at a lower court stage. Repeated consideration of the same case within the same trial stage, or adjudication of similar or related cases, is not by itself a ground for disqualification. The summary refers to a Court of Cassation precedent (1612/2022) and notes an instance where a judge participated in a five-judge appellate decision (2021/4427) and later in a general appellate decision (2023/4324) concerning the same dispute.

02

Summary

The settled principle is that prior adjudication counts as a disqualifying cause when it occurred at a lower stage of the proceedings, not when the judge simply heard the matter again at the same stage or heard related matters. Given that the two decisions mentioned were issued at the same appellate stage, the authority found that the judge's later participation did not violate Article (123/6) of the Civil Procedure Law and also noted no breach of Article (132/6) as set out in the points. This summary is for general educational purposes and is not a judicial text or legal advice.

03

Practical significance

- Emphasizes that disqualification based on prior consideration requires the earlier decision to have been at a lower stage of the proceedings. - Participation of a judge in multiple decisions issued at the same appellate stage does not automatically warrant a recusal request under the cited provisions. - Clarifies the scope for challenging a judge on grounds of "prior adjudication" in light of the cited jurisprudence.

Notice: this article is general educational information and does not constitute legal advice or a final assessment of any matter.

Sources and references

Verify the official text and latest amendments before relying on this material professionally.

Read also