Judicial principles and studies

Transactions by a Dying Patient and Subsequent Ratification by Heirs

Summary of the rules governing validity and effect of transactions made by a dying patient and the conditions for their enforcement under the relevant statutory and evidentiary provisions.

Updated: 10 September 2026

Prepared and reviewed by: Ashraf Al-Khawaja

01

Subject

Principles and procedural rules concerning transactions made by a dying patient and the effect of subsequent ratification by heirs, based on the relevant statutory provisions and settled case law.

02

Summary

- Transactions made by a dying patient in favor of one of his heirs are valid but their effect is suspended pending ratification by the remaining heirs; if ratified they become effective, if not they are void. - Ratification by only some heirs produces effect only as to the shares of those who ratified, not as to non‑ratifying heirs. - A dying‑patient transaction is not automatically void for lack of capacity unless the court file contains proof that the heir lacked or had diminished legal capacity; capacity is presumed under the applicable statutory provision. - An estate‑inventory consent signed by the heirs, when signatures are not denied, constitutes evidence against them pursuant to the evidentiary rules cited. - Testimony of relatives (e.g., sisters) is not per se inadmissible; objections based on whether testimony benefits or harms the witness are for the trial court to assess, and an appellate court may accept parts of such testimony. - If the plaintiff ratifies the deceased’s transactions made during the dying illness, a technical expert report is not necessarily required.

03

Practical significance

- Full enforcement of transactions by a dying patient requires heirs’ ratification; partial ratification affects only consenting shares. - Signed consent documents in the inheritance record carry evidentiary weight unless signatures are denied; capacity challenges require proof in the case file. - Courts weigh relatives’ testimony under the evidentiary rules and may rely on it if found credible. - Plaintiff ratification can obviate the need for technical expertise. This is a general educational summary and does not constitute a judicial text or legal advice.

Notice: this article is general educational information and does not constitute legal advice or a final assessment of any matter.

Sources and references

Verify the official text and latest amendments before relying on this material professionally.

Read also